The Pledge of Allegiance come the united States' flag has actually been part of American life for generations, yet not without part constitutional controversy.

You are watching: How to lead the pledge of allegiance


The pledge has existed in some form since September 1892 once it showed up in a magazine post that commemorated the 400th anniversary that Christopher Columbus’s come in the brand-new World.

Francis Bellamy, an ordained minister, created a pledge that would be handled Columbus day by countless school children. His version did not cite the indigenous “under God”:

“I pledge allegiance to my flag and also the Republic because that which the stands—one nation indivisible—with liberty and also justice because that all.”

Bellamy included an extra word, “to,” prior to “the Republic,” however other college officials modified the pledge end the years. Two historic groups added “to the flag that the United claims of America.”

In 1942, chairman Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a “Flag Code” regulation passed by conference that created rules because that the display and care of the flag and also included the Pledge.

The can be fried Court climate took the unusual step of ruling versus the Jehovah’s Witnesses in a legit fight against the Pledge and also reversing its own ruling within threeyears.

First in 1940 in the situation of Minersville institution District v. Gobitis, the Court hosted that a windy school can force students that wereJehovah’s Witnesses come salute the flag and say the Pledge.Justice Felix Frankfurter created in the bulk opinion that “conscientious scruples have actually not, in the course of the lengthy struggle for religious toleration, relieved the individual from obedience to a basic law no aimed at the promotion or border of religious beliefs.”

However,in1943, the Court changed its food in West Virginia State plank of education v. Barnette, where the bulk reversed the Gobitis decision and heldthatthe complimentary Speech i of the first Amendment prohibits public schools from forcing students to salute the American flag and also say the Pledge of Allegiance.”

“If over there is any fixed star in our constitution constellation, the is the no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall it is in orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or various other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by native or act their faith therein. If over there are any kind of circumstances which allow an exception, they execute not now take place to us,” claimed Justice Robert Jackson in his opinion.

Justice Frankfurter composed in his disagreement that, “The really purpose the a bill of legal rights was come withdraw certain subjects indigenous the vicissitudes of political controversy, to location them past the with of majorities and also officials and to establish them as legal values to be applied by the courts.”

Later in the decade, part people included the indigenous “under God” come the Pledge and also in 1954, chairman Dwight Eisenhower signed a invoice passed by conference that placed the native “under God” in ~ the expression “one nation indivisible.”

Over the complying with decades, there have been legal difficulties concerning the use of those 2 words in the Pledge.

Most notably, in 2004 the supreme Court rule in a case carried by one atheist who claimed a California school’s pledge necessity violated his daughter’s legal rights under the first Amendment’s establishment and free Exercise Clauses.In Elk Grove Unified institution District v. Newdow , the supreme Court go not end up judgment on the legality of the native “under God” in relationship to the first Amendment.Instead, Justice man Paul Stevens said Newdow didn’t have actually standing to carry suit due to the fact that he lacked adequate custody over his daughter.

But chef Justice wilhelm Rehnquist and also Justices Sandra job O’Connor and also Clarence cutting board wrote different concurrences, stating that requiring teachers to lead the Pledge, regardless of the consists of the phrase, “under God,” to be constitutional.

A similar an obstacle to the Pledge was denied through twofederal appeals court in 2010, which ruled“that the Pledge that Allegiance does no violate the facility Clause because Congress’ ostensible and also predominant purpose was to accumulate patriotism” and“both the selection to interact in the recitation the the Pledge and the selection not to perform so are entirely voluntary.”

Two current legal challenges likewise targeted state constitutions, and not the U.S. Constitution, for guidance around using the native “under God.”

In 2014, the Massachusetts case Jane Doe v. Acton-Boxborough regional School ar involved a group of parents, teachers and the American Humanist association in an action against a school district.The group declared the Pledge requirement, including the usage of the native “under God,” violated the equal protection clause that the state’s constitution. The state can be fried Court didn’t agree.

Also in2014, a new Jersey family and also the American Humanist combination filed a comparable lawsuit versus the Matawan-Aberdeen local School District, seek to remove the use of the words “under God” from Pledges taken in ~ public schools.The college district said that it to be just following a new Jersey state regulation that requires schools to have a day-to-day recitation that the Pledge, and that separation, personal, instance students weren’t compelled to take part. In February 2015, a judge ruled in favor of the institution district.

An event in 2019 drew attention to the capability of says to call for students at public institutions to gain parental permission prior to opting the end of the pledge, when a sixth-grade student was arrested in a pledge dispute. That instance was dropped in march 2019, yet the event harkened earlier to Frazier v. Winn, a 2008 lower court decision the the U.S. Can be fried Court did no take ~ above appeal.

See more: How To Have More Sex With Your Wife To Have More Sex With You

In that case, the 11th Circuit Appeals Court upheld Florida’s state requiring parental permission as constitutional. “Although we expropriate that the government ordinarily may not compel student to get involved in the Pledge, e.g., Barnette, we also recognize the a parent's best to interfere through the wishes of his kid is stronger than a public school official's right to interfere on behalf of the school's very own interest,” the federal court said. “Most important, the statute at some point leaves it to the parent whether a schoolchild will certainly pledge or not.”

Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the national Constitution Center.

Filed Under: 14th Amendment, Culture, first Amendment, facility Clause, Speech and Press Clause